Review of Marc Morris’s King John

Morris, Marc, King John: Treachery, Tyranny and the Road to Magna Carta, The Journal of Shinawatra University, Vol.3, No.1 (Jan-Apr, 2016), pp.58-61.

61uoYWahrjL._AC_US218_

King John: Treachery, Tyranny and the Road to Magna Carta
Marc Morris
London: Windmill Books, 2015
ISBN: 9780099591825
XVIII + 382 pp

King John is perhaps best known among British people for being so bad a monarch that there can never be a John II and for losing the crown in the Wash (part of the sea to the east of the country off Lincolnshire). His representations on stage, screen and printed page are mostly limited to being the bad guy in contrast to Richard the Lionheart and using his proxy the Sheriff of Nottingham to persecute the sainted Robin Hood. Who, really, can quote from Shakespeare’s play? However, much of this is little more than hearsay and accurate information about the life and times of the historical king is comparatively limited, at least for non-specialists. Consequently, a work of popular history on the subject is most welcome.

The value of works of popular history is that they are obliged to tell the actual story in as clear terms as possible. Academic history is required to present the myriad of quiddities and contradictions that appear in the sources and to take various theoretical frameworks of analysis as a means of examining the material in such a way that it is possible for the reader to remain unsure of what, if anything, actually did happen. One of the more notable benefits of the current book is that it is made clear why this confusion takes place: it was so difficult actually to get anything done, while there were powerful incentives to try to broadcast quite the opposite in a world in which significant enemies could respond aggressively to any show of weakness. Indeed, it is not difficult to find evidence of weakness in John’s performance since, during the first part of his reign, he managed to lose possession of England’s (this was the pre-union era) extensive holdings in what is now known as France. As Morris announces (p.5): “Travellers could pass from the border of Scotland to the border of Spain without ever leaving his territories. Millions of people, speaking at least half a dozen different languages, were his subjects. By any measure, his was the most important and powerful dominion in Europe.”

The Norman Yoke had been imposed upon the British people only 150 years before and it had led to the creation of the empire which had become anglicized at the highest-level because of the agricultural value of England. This could have been used for the benefit of all people through such means as more integration of economic and social systems to help create a civilization that would rival Byzantium. Instead, it was used for predatory raids on the working people and frittered away in needless wars and diplomatic failures. John lost France and his influence in Ireland was greatly reduced after a disastrous adventure there. Yet all of this was effected not so much by active misrule as by the inability to get things done. So much effort had to be expended persuading minor nobility to do what was expected of them and acting as the gift-giver able to create and sustain patronage networks that it was almost impossible for a limited monarch like John (whose ascent to the throne was made possible by a relentless plague visited upon his many older relatives in the direct line) to find the time to do anything else. Furthermore, a great deal of what he wanted to achieve was subject to forces beyond his control, notably including the weather. British weather is notoriously changeable and British sea power, its traditional strength in European politics, was limited in the pre-steam era to the prevailing conditions. Any foreign military venture required naval support both for transportation and for bringing needed supplies, reinforcements and information. An inconvenient storm could, therefore, waste months and even years of planning as the gathered troops and their leaders wait in port eating the food and spending the money raised by taxation while waiting for the rain to stop.

However, irrespective of the vagaries of getting things done, what John actually did get done was often quite despicable. A notable example of this was his predatory taxation policy (back to the Sheriff of Nottingham theme), which extended to various ruses aimed at acquiring assets, including people, from those who felt they had a legal claim to them. This was not only wrong for ethical reasons but actively dissolved the bods between monarch and nobility on which the political order of the country depended. The more that John alienated his erstwhile supporters, the closer he came to the creation of Magna Carta, that restatement of the social bonds between the classes that has become so central to the unwritten constitution of the United Kingdom. Had John’s reign not taken place or had taken place in a different manner, then the Magna Carta moment would have happened somewhat later. That it would have happened in some form appears to be an unavoidable fact.

Morris is to be praised for producing a clear and readable book that highlights the major themes of the life and times of an important but little understood period of British history. One would be forgiven for thinking, based on popular culture, that little happened between the Norman invasion and the six wives of Henry VIII. This book helps to fill that gap in knowledge. If, occasionally, the reader might hope for a little more information about some of the contextual or background issues, that is beyond the scope of this book and Morris provides enough information in the footnotes and references for that reader to create a personal reading list for further investigation.

John Walsh, Shinawatra University

Advertisements

Review of Giteau’s History of Angkor

4114KGH78GL._SY344_BO1,204,203,200_

 

One of the problems involved in try to get to grips with Cambodian history is the lack of straightforward accounts of what we know about what happened, where and when. This is at least partly because the principal source of information is in the form of inscriptions on stones written in a language that few people can understand. Inscriptions are not always written with a view to expressing clearly the kind of information that would be useful to a contemporary audience but, instead, involves the kind of religious material that once was considered incredibly important.

Read the full review here.

Review of America’s Greatest Blunder by Burton Pines

untitled

As we move towards a century of time separating us from the events of World War One, it is inevitable that many writers will grace us with their opinions of the meaning of the events and their retelling from new and interesting angles. In this well-written and carefully argued book, author Burton Yale Pines contributes to the re-evaluation by considering the role of America in the final years of the Great War.

Read the full review here.

Review of Bose’s Secrets of the Battlebox

For a colonial outpost that was considered to be one of the pearls in the imperial crown, the supposed fortress of Singapore fell with surprising rapidity. A combination of incompetence, unpreparedness and ill-fortune led to the naval taskforce being sent to the ocean depths by Japanese planes; a swift landing and then the rolling up of what remained of the defenders soon followed and then that was it for British invincibility in Asia.

Read the full review here.

Review of Hobsbawm’s Primitive Rebels

In Primitive Rebels, one of his first published works (originally written in 1959 and published in 1965), the leading Marxist historian Eric Hobsbawm focuses on various instances of small-scale rebellion and uprising by individuals and small groups which had previously been ignored, because in his own words: “Little attention has been paid to modern movements of social protest which fall outside the classic patterns of labour or socialist agitation, and even less to those whose political colouring is not modernist or progressive but conservative, or reactionary or, at any rate, rather inarticulate.”

Read the full review here.

Review of Burgess: Stories in Stone: The Sdok Kok Thom Inscription

The beauty and grandeur of the monuments left by the Khmer Empire, together with the anarchy and disorganization suffered by the people of that country for centuries, persuaded the European travelers and colonists who ‘discovered’ them that they must have been created by some other people, possibly Alexander the Great or the tribe of wandering Jews. Adding to the mystery of the ruins was the difficulty involved in trying to interpret their meaning and who was responsible for them.

Read the full review here.

Review of Flower’s The Penang Adventure

Last week (at the time of writing this, of course–November 2010), I was in Phuket for a conference. Phuket came to international prominence because of the exploitation of the tin used there on an industrial scale (primitive mining had been taking place for centuries beforehand) and then exported around the world. To work the mines, numerous Chinese workers were imported and their presence has radically transformed the sociology of the island.

Read the full review here.